LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Is CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 still/really dangerous?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6 still/really dangerous?
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:28:56 +0200
Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 4 June 2010 23:21, Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> did you experience any breakage as a result of switching on
>> CONFIG_IP_VS_IPV6?  I mean apart from it having incomplete
>> functionality.  The gist of the question is whether this option
>> is suitable for generic distro kernels or not, cf. above.
>
> We are still going through full testing of IPV6 for our next release
> Loadbalancer.org appliance v7 (vanilla 2.6.34 kernel).
> No major problems found yet, we will come back to the list if we hit
> anything....

Great, thanks for the info!
-- 
Cheers,
Feri.

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>