LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Issues with weighted round robin

To: himanshu.raina@xxxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Issues with weighted round robin
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:37:06 +0100
So .8 is "slow" and .5 is "fast", yes?

On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:29 +0530, Himanshu Raina wrote:
> Prot LocalAddress:Port  Conns   InPkts    OutPkts  InBytes  OutBytes
> TCP  192.168.2.1:80     1877189 39344549  0        11215M   0
>   -> 192.168.2.8:80      599836 25601414  0        7877M    0
>   -> 192.168.2.5:80     1277353 13743135  0        3338M    0

That makes sense for the "conns" statistic, where slow:fast are in an
approximate ratio of 30:70. This makes perfect sense.

The packet and byte counters, however, look slightly unusual in that
they are in opposition - slow:fast 65:35.

As these are webservers, are they running the same server version with
the same configuration? I'll hazard a guess here that the "slow" server
has HTTP KeepAlives turned on, where the "fast" server does not...

Graeme


_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>