Re: [lvs-users] Kernel 2.6.35 and 100% S.I. CPU Time

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Kernel 2.6.35 and 100% S.I. CPU Time
From: JL <lvs@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:06:53 +0100
On 14 September 2010 10:00, JL <lvs@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Then might I recommend an Occam's Roazor approach to this? Compile a
>> number of kernels from the one which worked up to the one which doesn't.
>> Reboot the backup; test; if it doesn't happen then you know the change
>> cam later than the kernel you're running.
> I intend to do that.

The results: - OK - OK
  2.6.28 - Fail - Fail w/ Classic RCU - Fail w/ Tree RCU - Fail - Fail - Fail

I'm convinced the problem was introduced in 2.6.28.

I still believe this is somehow related to the insertion of connection
entries received from the master into some in-memory table on the

Jarrod Lowe

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>