Thanks a lot Joe, much appreciated.
This make sense of what I am seeing. I'll try to get this working
tonight and see if there is any useful information/documentation I can
provide back if there is any missing.
I can see why this isn't that common of a use-case/topic.
On 21/03/11 12:04 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
>> Thanks Joe,
>> I see what you're saying.
>> Would you expect this to work if I used say the same TCP 9000 across
>> several lo:0 intefaces?
> not sure. This has been talked about before. Look for
> "127.0.0.2" in these sections
> this same reference to 127.0.0.2 is also mentioned in
> but AFAIK, no-one has used it.
> Let me know if it does/doesn't work so I can write it up
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users