LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?

To: Neil Aggarwal <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:57:41 +0900
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:31:51PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> According to this page:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/docs/ha/heartbeat_ldirectord.html
> 
> In haresources, heartbeat manages the IP address and ldirectord
> process on the load balancers.  
> 
> I think I would rather have ldirectord always running (using inittab 
> with a respawn) and have heartbeat manage the virtual IP address.
> 
> Is there a downside to always having ldirectord running on both
> load balancers?

IMHO, no, its just a matter of taste.

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>