Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?

To: Neil Aggarwal <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Why have heartbeat manage ldirectord?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:57:41 +0900
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:31:51PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello:
> According to this page:
> In haresources, heartbeat manages the IP address and ldirectord
> process on the load balancers.  
> I think I would rather have ldirectord always running (using inittab 
> with a respawn) and have heartbeat manage the virtual IP address.
> Is there a downside to always having ldirectord running on both
> load balancers?

IMHO, no, its just a matter of taste.

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>