Thanks for your update.
I've tried to apply these to a vanilla 18.104.22.168 kernel and I'm getting a lot of
rejects (a few successes).
What kernel do these patches apply to please?
On 08 December 2011 09:42 Simon Horman Wrote:
>I believe that the patch you are after is "ipvs: changes for local real
>Looking over the logs, you may also want to consider the following
>* ipvs: changes for local client
>* ipvs: restore support for iptables SNAT
>> I'm trying to get the behaviour working on a rhel/centos 6 kernel which is
>based on 2.6.32.
>> To my unpractised eye the differences between ipvs on vanilla 22.214.171.124 and
>126.96.36.199 do not seem too great. It seems involved on adding SCTP support.
>> I'm hoping (probably futile) that I might be able to use the files in the url
>above with little or no alteration.
>> Is that a vain hope?
>There do seem to be some more changes, but nothing that seems particularly
>> Also to clarify, the new behaviour is that for ipvs nat to a IP on the
>> node, the application needs to listen on the RIP and not the VIP?
>If you use the MASQ forwarding mechanism and the RIP is a local IP address
>on the director, then it will be handled locally.
>In this case the RIP and the VIP may be the same address.
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users