Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup.

To: Hans Schillström <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup.
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ja@xxxxxx" <ja@xxxxxx>, "ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 08:15:31 +0900
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0200, Hans Schillström wrote:
> >Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/6] IPVS: init and cleanup.
> >
> >On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 08:25:28AM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > This patch series handles exit from a network name space.
> >
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >thanks for your work on this.
> >I've looked over the patches and nothing catches my eye -
> >thanks for fixing up the things that I commented on previously.
> >
> >I think that patches 1 and 2 should be targeted at 2.6.39,
> >while the remainder look like 2.6.40 material. Does that
> >sound reasonable to you?
> I do prefer to keep them together, 
> but if you want it in that way it's OK for me.

I understand that you'd like to keep things together,
but I think its too much change for .39 this late
in the rc series.

> We are doing a lot of tests right now with this patch set.
> If we found any issues I'll let you know.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>