lvs-devel
|
To: | Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] netfilter, ipvs: Avoid undefined order of evaluation in assignments to struct nf_conn * |
Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 30 May 2011 08:23:37 +0900 |
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > In net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nfct.c::ip_vs_update_conntrack(), > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c::ip_vs_nat_xmit(), > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c::ip_vs_nat_xmit_v6(), > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c::ip_vs_icmp_xmit)() > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c::and ip_vs_icmp_xmit_v6() we do this: > ... > struct nf_conn *ct = ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); > ... > > Since '=' is not a sequence point the order of these assignments happening > is undefined. Luckily it's easy to avoid by just doing what is obviously > the intended thing: > struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo); > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [PATCH] ipvs: restore support for iptables SNAT, Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] IPVS : bug in ip_vs_ftp, same list heaad used in all netns., Simon Horman |
Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] netfilter, ipvs: Avoid undefined order of evaluation in assignments to struct nf_conn *, Jesper Juhl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |