|
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:40:09AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Mike Maxim wrote:
> > The reason I put that in is because the size of that table becomes
> > more relevant/important if you decide to use the weights in the manner
> > the patch lets you. It would be conceivable that someone might need to
> > increase the size of that table to accommodate their configuration, so
> > I thought it would be handy to be able to do that through the regular
> > configuration system instead of editing the source.
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I agree, but I think its also reasonable to consider IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS as
> a separate change.
>
> Could you
>
> 1. Split the patch into a Kconfig patch and a ip_vs_sh.c patch
> 2. Remove spurious line additions from the resulting patches?
Scratch that, please follow Pablo's request.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
