lvs-devel
|
To: | Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible |
Cc: | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:23:27 -0700 |
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:17:08PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> > > Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol. > > This is safe since it will always run from a process context. > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt requirements? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl, Simon Horman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible, Simon Horman |
Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible, Simon Horman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible, Simon Horman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |