On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:12:11PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The registration of a protocol might fail, there were no checks
> > and all registrations were assumed to be correct. This lead to
> > NULL ptr dereferences when apps tried registering.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > [ 1293.226051] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> > 0000000000000018
> > [ 1293.227038] IP: [<ffffffff822aacb0>] tcp_register_app+0x60/0xb0
> > [ 1293.227038] PGD 391de067 PUD 6c20b067 PMD 0
> > [ 1293.227038] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [ 1293.227038] CPU 1
> > [ 1293.227038] Pid: 19609, comm: trinity Tainted: G W
> > 3.4.0-rc1-next-20120405-sasha-dirty #57
> > [ 1293.227038] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff822aacb0>] [<ffffffff822aacb0>]
> > tcp_register_app+0x60/0xb0
> > [ 1293.227038] RSP: 0018:ffff880038c1dd18 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > [ 1293.227038] RAX: ffffffffffffffc0 RBX: 0000000000001500 RCX:
> > 0000000000010000
> > [ 1293.227038] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88003a2d5888 RDI:
> > 0000000000000282
> > [ 1293.227038] RBP: ffff880038c1dd48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 1293.227038] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
> > ffff88003a2d5668
> > [ 1293.227038] R13: ffff88003a2d5988 R14: ffff8800696a8ff8 R15:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 1293.227038] FS: 00007f01930d9700(0000) GS:ffff88007ce00000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 1293.227038] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > [ 1293.227038] CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000065dfc000 CR4:
> > 00000000000406e0
> > [ 1293.227038] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 1293.227038] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
> > 0000000000000400
> > [ 1293.227038] Process trinity (pid: 19609, threadinfo ffff880038c1c000,
> > task ffff88002dc73000)
> > [ 1293.227038] Stack:
> > [ 1293.227038] ffff880038c1dd48 00000000fffffff4 ffff8800696aada0
> > ffff8800694f5580
> > [ 1293.227038] ffffffff8369f1e0 0000000000001500 ffff880038c1dd98
> > ffffffff822a716b
> > [ 1293.227038] 0000000000000000 ffff8800696a8ff8 0000000000000015
> > ffff8800694f5580
> > [ 1293.227038] Call Trace:
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff822a716b>] ip_vs_app_inc_new+0xdb/0x180
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff822a7258>] register_ip_vs_app_inc+0x48/0x70
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff822b2fea>] __ip_vs_ftp_init+0xba/0x140
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff821c9060>] ops_init+0x80/0x90
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff821c90cb>] setup_net+0x5b/0xe0
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff821c9416>] copy_net_ns+0x76/0x100
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff810dc92b>] create_new_namespaces+0xfb/0x190
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff810dca21>] unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0x61/0x80
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff810afd1f>] sys_unshare+0xff/0x290
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff8187622e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> > [ 1293.227038] [<ffffffff82665539>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > [ 1293.227038] Code: 89 c7 e8 34 91 3b 00 89 de 66 c1 ee 04 31 de 83 e6 0f
> > 48 83 c6 22 48 c1 e6 04 4a 8b 14 26 49 8d 34 34 48 8d 42 c0 48 39 d6 74 13
> > <66> 39 58 58 74 22 48 8b 48 40 48 8d 41 c0 48 39 ce 75 ed 49 8d
> > [ 1293.227038] RIP [<ffffffff822aacb0>] tcp_register_app+0x60/0xb0
> > [ 1293.227038] RSP <ffff880038c1dd18>
> > [ 1293.227038] CR2: 0000000000000018
> > [ 1293.379284] ---[ end trace 364ab40c7011a009 ]---
> > [ 1293.381182] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I've removed this above from the patch. I prefer not to add confusing
> information (this means you'll have to rebase, sorry).
Understood.
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applied. Thanks.
Thanks.
> BTW, did you consider using an array for ipvs->ip_vs_proto_table?
>
> I think a hash table for only 5 protocols is overkill. I know, we'll
> consume more memory but lookups will definitely be faster, but it will
> consume a bit more memory (the space-time tradeoff again).
That sounds reasonable to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|