LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ja@xxxxxx, wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rohara@xxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:26:41 +0200
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:05:20PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 07:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > > Change order of init so netns init is ready
> > > when register ioctl and netlink.
> > > 
> > > Ver2 
> > >   Whitespace fixes and __init added.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: "Ryan O'Hara" <rohara@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Looks good, interdiff says you fixed up things, and I have tested it
> > against the net tree, good work :-)
> > 
> > Is this a stable tree candidate?
> 
> Yes, I think so.
> 
> I now have the following 7 changes in my ipvs tree on kernel.org.
> 
> The last two are already in Pablo's net tree and I intend
> to send a pull request for the remaining 5 soon.

OK, then I'll wait for that pull request to pass these 7 patch batch
to davem if you make it anytime soon.

> It is my opinion that all 7 patches are stable tree material.

Little reminder: We can ask for this once they have hit Linus' tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>