Re: [PATCH ipvs-next v3 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper

To: peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipvs-next v3 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Cc: horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx, eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx, ja@xxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 01:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 09:54:38 +0200

> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:50:30PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Add a helper that for use in loops which read data protected by RCU and
>> may have a large number of iterations.  Such an example is dumping the list
>> of connections known to IPVS: ip_vs_conn_array() and ip_vs_conn_seq_next().
>> This series also updates IPVS to use the helper.
>> Simon Horman (2):
>>   sched: add cond_resched_rcu() helper
>>   ipvs: use cond_resched_rcu() helper when walking connections
>>  include/linux/sched.h           |  9 +++++++++
>>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
>>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> How do you want to go about merging this? Do you want to route it
> through the net tree or through -tip?

I think we can have Pablo merge it into his netfilter tree.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>