Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address

[David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST)

>       Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about
> removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it
> as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway.
> May be more opinions will help to decide because I don't know
> if there are any plans to use similar techniques as done for IPv4.

I have no strong opinion about removing rt6_nexthop.

If it is of low cost today and makes the code easier to
undersand and grep, just leave it alone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html