|
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:47:54PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Building the ip_vs_sync code with CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on x86
> > > confuses the compiler to the point where it produces a rather
> > > dubious warning message:
> > >
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘opt.init_seq’ may be
> > > used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > struct ip_vs_sync_conn_options opt;
> > > ^~~
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘opt.delta’ may be used
> > > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘opt.previous_delta’ may
> > > be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘*((void
> > > *)&opt+12).init_seq’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘*((void
> > > *)&opt+12).delta’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1073:33: error: ‘*((void
> > > *)&opt+12).previous_delta’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > >
> > > The problem appears to be a combination of a number of factors, including
> > > the __builtin_bswap32 compiler builtin being slightly odd, having a large
> > > amount of code inlined into a single function, and the way that some
> > > functions only get partially inlined here.
> > >
> > > I've spent way too much time trying to work out a way to improve the
> > > code, but the best I've come up with is to add an explicit memset
> > > right before the ip_vs_seq structure is first initialized here. When
> > > the compiler works correctly, this has absolutely no effect, but in the
> > > case that produces the warning, the warning disappears.
> > >
> > > In the process of analysing this warning, I also noticed that
> > > we use memcpy to copy the larger ip_vs_sync_conn_options structure
> > > over two members of the ip_vs_conn structure. This works because
> > > the layout is identical, but seems error-prone, so I'm changing
> > > this in the process to directly copy the two members. This change
> > > seemed to have no effect on the object code or the warning, but
> > > it deals with the same data, so I kept the two changes together.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > OK,
> >
> > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> >
> > I guess, Simon will take the patch for ipvs-next.
>
> @Simon: If you have no more pending updates, I can save you one pull
> request for this small fix by placing this.
Thanks Pablo, please do.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
