lvs-devel
|
To: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [patch] ipvs: off by one in set_sctp_state() |
Cc: | Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Moahn Reddy <mohanreddykv@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:47:10 +0530 |
Hi,I see there is no problem in the code regarding the state change. And the thing why I took 255 in the sctp_events array is that as per the sctp specification, the 255 message is reserved, so I thought 0 to 254 messages are enough. Do you see any problem with the ipvs sctp code in the field?. Please let me know if you see any such, I will try to fix. Thanks, Mohan On Monday 22 April 2013 11:33 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote: Hello, On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Simon Horman wrote:There are more confusing (still, non-fatal) problems in this IPVS-SCTP support, eg. if (direction == IP_VS_DIR_OUTPUT) - event++; + event *= 2; I guess we are running with wrong timeouts.IMHO there seem to be many problems with SCTP, but it is good to fix the ones we find as we find them.At the time I found it (during IPVS optimizations development), it didn't looked fatal, I preferred to allocate more time for SCTP for debugging.Would you like to make a patch for the above change or should I?May be the code is correct, my mistake. I was confused from the order in sctp_events[] but ipvs_sctp_event_t allocates values for _SER states.Also, I'm not sure we support properly the one-way states as done for TCP (IP_VS_DIR_INPUT_ONLY). May be this code deserves more serious review, for example, net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c looks as good source for comparison.I believe it does need a more serious review.Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] ipvs: off by one in set_sctp_state(), Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [patch] ipvs: off by one in set_sctp_state(), Dan Carpenter |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] ipvs: off by one in set_sctp_state(), Julian Anastasov |
Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] ipvs: off by one in set_sctp_state(), Dan Carpenter |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |