lvs-devel
|
To: | lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Standalone version of libipvs |
From: | Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:43:44 +0100 |
Hi all, I've been looking into IPVS for an internal project and have plans to write python bindings for libipvs. Now I noticed that both ipvsadm and keepalived use their own internal version of it, with some small differences between them. Since the library doesn't seem to change much and the API is reasonably stable, would you consider making it a separate project with a proper versioned soname? Kind regards, Ruben Kerkhof-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] ipvs: allow rescheduling of new connections when port reuse is detected, Simon Horman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Standalone version of libipvs, Alex Gartrell |
Previous by Thread: | [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] ipvs: check scheduler callback return values, Alex Gartrell |
Next by Thread: | Re: Standalone version of libipvs, Alex Gartrell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |