Oh, thanks.
Where I can find out the full procedure?
пт, 20 марта 2020 г. в 15:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:05:58 +0300
> Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > This micro ipvsadm patch fixes wrong (negative) FWMARK values
> > representation:
> >
> > # ipvsadm -L -f 2882430849
> > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> > FWM -1412536447 wlc
> > -> abc.my.host.net. Tunnel 1 0 0
> >
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Your patch submission does not follow all the procedures, but given
> this is fairly trivial, and Julian didn't object, I went ahead and
> applied the patch with (your SoB and credit to you), here:
>
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/ipvsadm/ipvsadm.git/commit/?id=e61c8cdd1dcad
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
>
> --
Alexander Petrovsky
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|