Re: [PATCH 4/4] ipvs: reduce kernel stack usage

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:37 PM Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> >       struct ip_vs_conn *ctl_cp = cp->control;
> >       if (!ctl_cp) {
> > -             IP_VS_ERR_BUF("request control DEL for uncontrolled: "
> > -                           "%s:%d to %s:%d\n",
> > -                           IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(cp->af, &cp->caddr),
> > -                           ntohs(cp->cport),
> > -                           IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(cp->af, &cp->vaddr),
> > -                           ntohs(cp->vport));
> > +             pr_err("request control DEL for uncontrolled: "
> > +                    "%pISp to %pISp\n",

(replying a bit late)

>         ip_vs_dbg_addr() used compact form (%pI6c), so it would be
> better to use %pISc and %pISpc everywhere in IPVS...

done

>         Also, note that before now port was printed with %d and
> ntohs() was used, now port should be in network order, so:
>
> - ntohs() should be removed

done

> - htons() should be added, if missing. At first look, this case
> is not present in IPVS, we have only ntohs() usage

I found one case in ip_vs_ftp_in() that needs it in order to subtract one:

                IP_VS_DBG(7, "protocol %s %pISpc %pISpc\n",
                          ip_vs_proto_name(ipvsh->protocol),
-                         IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &to, ntohs(port)),
+                         IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &to, port),
                          IP_VS_DBG_SOCKADDR(cp->af, &cp->vaddr,
-                                             ntohs(cp->vport)-1));
+                                            htons(ntohs(cp->vport)-1)));

Thanks for the review, I'll send a new patch after some more
build testing on the new version.

       Arnd