Hello,
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> From: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> rs_lock needs a key to make lock dep happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> index 2b771dc..a1af72f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(__ip_vs_mutex);
>
> /* lock for service table */
> static DEFINE_RWLOCK(__ip_vs_svc_lock);
> +static struct lock_class_key ip_vs_rs_key;
ip_vs_rs_key remains unused without debugging. I don't
remember the reason why IPVS is the only place that calls
__rwlock_init instead of rwlock_init. Can we use rwlock_init?
> /* sysctl variables */
>
> @@ -3680,6 +3681,7 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct net *net)
> struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
>
> ipvs->rs_lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ipvs->rs_lock);
> + __rwlock_init(&ipvs->rs_lock, "ipvs->rs_lock", &ip_vs_rs_key);
>
> /* Initialize rs_table */
> for (idx = 0; idx < IP_VS_RTAB_SIZE; idx++)
> --
> 1.7.4.4
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|