|
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:05:25PM -0500, krishna prasad wrote:
> Any feed-back on this?
>
> Thanks
> Prasad.
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, krishna prasad
> <krishna.sirigiri@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I was going thru the LVS documents and tutorial especially the high
> > availability features supported.As per my understanding
> > 1) When active director fails the clients with established connections
> > don't experience any connection loss, i.e. no reconnection is required.
> > (this is because that active director has synchronized the connection state
> > with backup director)
> > 2) When the real server fails, clients need to reconnect as director don't
> > move the connections to backup real server.
> >
> > Assuming that my understanding is correct, how complex or big to have a
> > feature to support moving connections of failed real server to other real
> > server?
I believe that this can be achieved by running fault tolerant real-servers,
that is two real-servers running in lock-step. Two solutions that
I am aware of that allow that to be done are Kemari and Remus, both of
which. I believe that both of those solutions work in conjunction with Xen
and that a version of Kemari for KVM is also available.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
