|
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:16:47 +0300
Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, thanks.
>
> Where I can find out the full procedure?
As this is a tool that is closely related to the kernel, I/we try to
follow the kernel submitting patch guidelines, but losely:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
--Jesper
> пт, 20 марта 2020 г. в 15:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:05:58 +0300
> > Alexander Petrovsky <askjuise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > This micro ipvsadm patch fixes wrong (negative) FWMARK values
> > > representation:
> > >
> > > # ipvsadm -L -f 2882430849
> > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> > > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> > > FWM -1412536447 wlc
> > > -> abc.my.host.net. Tunnel 1 0 0
> > >
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > Your patch submission does not follow all the procedures, but given
> > this is fairly trivial, and Julian didn't object, I went ahead and
> > applied the patch with (your SoB and credit to you), here:
> >
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/ipvsadm/ipvsadm.git/commit/?id=e61c8cdd1dcad
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
> >
> > --
> Alexander Petrovsky
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
|
