LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling

from [Rob Smith] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling
From: Rob Smith <kormoc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:09:30 -0800 
On Jan 24, 2013, at 3:50 AM, Anders Henke <anders.henke@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> None of the current IPVS schedulers do know "highest weight" balancing.

Hi Anders,

Thank you for the very informative and comprehensive reply.

We decided that using 65535/1 would work well enough for our use case.

Thanks again,
~Rob

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling, Anders Henke
Previous by Thread:  Re: [lvs-users] Highest weight only scheduling, Anders Henke
Next by Thread:  [lvs-users] Persistence, Failover, and a PFSense Router., Matthew Smart
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]