|
Is there a particular reason they're non-persistent,
or do you think this would this be a plausible a feature request?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Malcolm Turnbull" <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is --timeout intended as non-persistent?
Kendrick,
I don't think anyone will be too worried about how Piranha works on this list...
But most people just put the TCP timeout settings in rc.local or
rc.firewall or some other bootscript as they are non-persistent.
On 27 July 2011 15:43, Kendrick Gay <kgay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like they're asking how to set the TCP timeout value persistently,
> as opposed to a virtual service?
>
> I apologies in advance for my ignorance of LVS. Let me give you my client's
> inquiries in their own words, as I believe they explain it a bit clearer:
>
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
Kendrick Gay, RHCE
Global Support Services, TSE
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
