|
Hi Sébastien,
This issue sounds similar to one I posted a patch to last year.
Wensong may have already patched it but I am not sure when a release
is expected. Simon or Wensong may best know when the release is
scheduled.
Request for patch:
http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00027.html
Original post/patch:
http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2011-08/msg00033.html
Regards,
Jacoby
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Seblu <seblu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ipvsadm 1.26, -L option doesn't work correctly on i686. Option work
> correctly with 1.25 or on x86_64.
>
> After running those 3 following command on a test host
>
> ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.72.122:80 -s rr
> ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.125:80 -g -w 10
> ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.126:80 -g -w 10
>
> i got on i686:
> # uname -m
> i686
> # ipvsadm -Ln
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr
> -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0
>
> We can see a real server is missing. Trying to add it twice trigger a
> new error:
> # ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.126:80 -g -w 10
> Destination already exists
>
> So, i supposed it's a listing issue, because entry is present. in
> addition, if i test with ipvsadm 1.25, listing is done correctly.
>
> # cd ~/ipvsadm-1.25
> # ./ipvsadm -Ln
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr
> -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0
> -> 192.168.72.126:80 Route 10 0 0
> -> 192.168.72.129:80 Route 11 0 0
>
>
> on x86_64 all works fine with ipvsadm 1.26:
> # uname -m
> x86_64
> # ipvsadm -Ln
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr
> -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0
> -> 192.168.72.126:80 Route 10 0 0
>
>
> Those tests was done with a linux 3.2.5 on archlinux and on fedora.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Sébastien Luttringer
> www.seblu.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
