Nope. There's no iptables ruleset running there, and I think we do not
need to do extra iptables work to let those packets through, right?
I even disabled firewall and SELinux, but no luck.
Wang
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 17:06 +0800, wang yi wrote:
>> Running Wireshark on the director showed that it got the UDP
>> packets from client, but responsed these packets with an ICMP message,
>> Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)
>
> I assume you have an iptables ruleset running there. Is there a hole in
> it which lets those packets through?
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|