|
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Marco Lorig wrote:
> Am 17.03.2020 um 14:23 schrieb Julian Anastasov:
> >
> > Yes, when nf_conntrack is used it would be better to
> > set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack to 1, as reported by different
> > users, for example:
> >
> > https://marc.info/?t=134728825000003&r=1&w=2
> >
> > In this case, you have to increase nf_conntrack_max sysctl var
> > to allow the desired number of conntracks to be created.
> >
> Ok, i will give it a try. nf_conntrack_max is set to 262144 (default?).
> I would set it to 1024000. Do you have any recommondation for this
> value? ip_vs_conn shows 18753 entries.
Make sure nf_conntrack_count does not reach the nf_conntrack_max
value.
> > Another option is to use NOTRACK to disable nf conntracks just for
> > the IPVS traffic:
> >
> > iptables -t raw -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d VIP --dport VPORT -j CT --notrack
> >
> > For local clients use -A OUTPUT -o lo
>
> As we do not use any iptables rule or connection tracking (except for
> ipvs) on the loadbalancer, could it be an option for performance
> optimization to disable nf_conntrack (like ip_conntrack in the past) or
> is it essentially needed for proper ipvs functionality?
If you do not use iptables rules, you can disable it, it is
not needed for the IPVS traffic. Only IP_VS_NFCT, IP_VS_FTP and IP_VS_PE_SIP
depend on it. But as IP_VS_NFCT is not a separate module, may be you have
to compile IPVS without these features.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
