- 1. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:05:06 +0300 (EEST)
- Hello, Looks correct to me, just fix the below indentations. Also, please use version number for your patches, eg. [PATCHv2] ipvs: ... Indentation: IP_VS_DBG_BUF(6, "SH: selected unavailable server %
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00041.html (11,940 bytes)
- 2. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:05:40 +0100
- Improve the SH fallback realserver selection strategy. With sh and sh-fallback, if a realserver is down, this attempts to distribute the traffic that would have gone to that server evenly among the r
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00040.html (12,887 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:30:14 +0300 (EEST)
- Hello, Can we reduce the indentation here, eg: if (!is_unavailable(dest)) return dest; IP_VS_DBG_BUF(6, "SH: selected unavailable server " ... for ()... ... return NULL; Every result of rcu_dereferen
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00039.html (14,386 bytes)
- 4. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:26:38 +0100
- Improve the SH fallback realserver selection strategy. With sh and sh-fallback, if a realserver is down, this attempts to distribute the traffic that would have gone to that server evenly among the r
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00038.html (12,779 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:01:50 +0100
- Hi, Sure. I have a bad habit of assuming that if I understand something, then others automatically do too. :-) The original code went through the table, starting at the same place as the code without
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00037.html (11,407 bytes)
- 6. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:30:33 +0900
- Hi Alexander, could you add some comments to the code or at least a description of the algorithm to the above the function. The intent of original code may not have been obvious to the eye but this v
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00036.html (13,072 bytes)
- 7. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:32:38 +0100
- Improve the SH fallback realserver selection strategy. With sh and sh-fallback, if a realserver is down, this attempts to distribute the traffic that would have gone to that server evenly among the r
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00035.html (11,602 bytes)
- 8. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:42:50 +0400
- Hello. Improve the SH fallback realserver selection strategy. With sh and sh-fallback, if a realserver is down, this attempts to distribute the traffic that would have gone to that server evenly amon
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00034.html (12,093 bytes)
- 9. [PATCH] ipvs: improved SH fallback strategy (score: 1)
- Author: Alexander Frolkin <avf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:51:39 +0100
- Improve the SH fallback realserver selection strategy. With sh and sh-fallback, if a realserver is down, this attempts to distribute the traffic that would have gone to that server evenly among the r
- /html/lvs-devel/2013-09/msg00033.html (11,046 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu