Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+div

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+div_s64\s+for\s+signed\s+division\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division (score: 1): Author: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:24:15 +0100; No, it's the same bug. I had prepared my patch before the other fix went in, and only one of the two is needed. FWIW, I find my version slightly more readable, but Jakub's fix is probably more effici; /html/lvs-devel/2022-12/msg00022.html (11,112 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division (score: 1): Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 11:10:41 +0100; Hi Julian, Arnd's patch applies fine on top of net-next, maybe he is addressing something else?; /html/lvs-devel/2022-12/msg00021.html (12,515 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:01:59 +0200 (EET); Hello, net-next already contains fix for this warning and changes val to u64. On CONFIG_X86_32 both versions execute single divl for our case but div_s64 is not inlined. I'm not expert in this area b; /html/lvs-devel/2022-12/msg00020.html (11,696 bytes)
4. [PATCH] ipvs: use div_s64 for signed division (score: 1): Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:03:15 +0100; do_div() is only well-behaved for positive numbers, and now warns when the first argument is a an s64: net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_est.c: In function 'ip_vs_est_calc_limits': include/asm-generic/div64.h; /html/lvs-devel/2022-12/msg00019.html (10,907 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]