Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+Verify\s+that\s+IP_VS\s+protocol\s+has\s+been\s+registered\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:59 +0900
Understood. Thanks. That sounds reasonable to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00130.html (15,623 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:14:22 +0200
I've removed this above from the patch. I prefer not to add confusing information (this means you'll have to rebase, sorry). Applied. Thanks. BTW, did you consider using an array for ipvs->ip_vs_prot
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00124.html (14,822 bytes)

3. [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:12:11 +0900
The registration of a protocol might fail, there were no checks and all registrations were assumed to be correct. This lead to NULL ptr dereferences when apps tried registering. For example: [ 1293.2
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00090.html (15,279 bytes)

4. [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:17:07 +0900
The registration of a protocol might fail, there were no checks and all registrations were assumed to be correct. This lead to NULL ptr dereferences when apps tried registering. For example: [ 1293.2
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00083.html (15,440 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu