Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+avoid\s+unused\s+variable\s+warnings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+1\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+avoid\s+unused\s+variable\s+warnings\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings (score: 1): Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:28:17 +0100; Ah, I had not realized that the other patch was still in ipvs-next and not merged in mainline. I did most of my testing on linux-next (with the previous patch) and then validated the new one on 4.5-r; /html/lvs-devel/2016-01/msg00008.html (12,359 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 08:39:53 +0900; Thanks, and sorry about not pushing the other patch to net-next. I have dropped it and queued up this one in its place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the; /html/lvs-devel/2016-01/msg00007.html (11,543 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:01:42 +0200 (EET); Hello, Looks like your previous patch for ip_vs_app_net_cleanup was delayed in ipvs-next tree. I guess, Simon should drop it and use this one instead when net-next opens: Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <; /html/lvs-devel/2016-01/msg00004.html (14,524 bytes)
4. [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings (score: 1): Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:52:01 +0100; The proc_create() and remove_proc_entry() functions do not reference their arguments when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled, so we get a couple of warnings about unused variables in IPVS: ipvs/ip_vs_app.c:6; /html/lvs-devel/2016-01/msg00002.html (13,536 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]