Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+GFP_KERNEL\s+allocation\s+where\s+possible\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+use\s+GFP_KERNEL\s+allocation\s+where\s+possible\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:29:36 +0900; Sorry about that, I would like to withdraw this change from consideration for stable. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxx; /html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00096.html (11,046 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible (score: 1): Author: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:23:27 -0700; How does this patch meet the Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt requirements? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxx; /html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00095.html (10,954 bytes)
3. [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ipvs: use GFP_KERNEL allocation where possible (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:17:08 +0900; Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when registering an ipvs protocol. This is safe since it will always run from a process context. Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha; /html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00082.html (10,848 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]