[ Cc: Pablo ] Good point. Pablo, what is the best way to handle this? Should I send the fix as a pull-request for nf or nf-next? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel
Hello, First patch is a bugfix, it should go to stable kernels. The second patch looks like an optimization. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
Thanks, I have pushed it to ipvs-next. I will hold off on sending a pull-request to Pablo until you send the 2nd patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the
Hello, The 'if' check for snat_handler should be: if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum || skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { Because we can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL from virtual devices, not
I am happy to take the 1st patch of the series as-is. Let me know if that works for you. Yes, sure. Then, I'll only resend the 2nd one today. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Daniel, I am happy to take the 1st patch of the series as-is. Let me know if that works for you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to
Hello, Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums [1]. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in softw
Hello, ... The above check should be little more complicated because local SCTP can decide to avoid setting ->checksum, there is a case when we can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for locally generated packets.
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Daniel, this will hopefully increase SCTP performance as we avoid recalculating the checksum when not necessary :-) -- Best regards, Jesper
Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums [1]. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in software, wh