Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+ipvs\s+2\/2\]\s+net\:\s+ipvs\:\s+sctp\:\s+do\s+not\s+recalc\s+sctp\s+checksum\s+when\s+not\s+needed\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:38:21 +0900
[ Cc: Pablo ] Good point. Pablo, what is the best way to handle this? Should I send the fix as a pull-request for nf or nf-next? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00073.html (13,096 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:00:37 +0200 (EET)
Hello, First patch is a bugfix, it should go to stable kernels. The second patch looks like an optimization. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00071.html (12,661 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:50:25 +0900
Thanks, I have pushed it to ipvs-next. I will hold off on sending a pull-request to Pablo until you send the 2nd patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00070.html (12,097 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:11:47 +0200 (EET)
Hello, The 'if' check for snat_handler should be: if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum || skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) { Because we can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL from virtual devices, not
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00069.html (14,049 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:11:41 +0100
I am happy to take the 1st patch of the series as-is. Let me know if that works for you. Yes, sure. Then, I'll only resend the 2nd one today. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00068.html (12,218 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:39:20 +0900
Hi Daniel, I am happy to take the 1st patch of the series as-is. Let me know if that works for you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00067.html (16,252 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:55:40 +0200
Hello, Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums [1]. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in softw
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00065.html (16,719 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:00:39 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, ... The above check should be little more complicated because local SCTP can decide to avoid setting ->checksum, there is a case when we can see CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for locally generated packets.
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00063.html (15,570 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:01:35 -0400
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00062.html (15,664 bytes)

10. Re: [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:48:13 +0200
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Daniel, this will hopefully increase SCTP performance as we avoid recalculating the checksum when not necessary :-) -- Best regards, Jesper
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00058.html (11,378 bytes)

11. [PATCH ipvs 2/2] net: ipvs: sctp: do not recalc sctp checksum when not needed (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:05:05 +0200
Unlike UDP or TCP, we do not take the pseudo-header into account in SCTP checksums [1]. So in case port mapping is the very same, we do not need to recalculate the whole SCTP checksum in software, wh
/html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00056.html (13,747 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu