Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\,v2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+orphan\s+skb\s+on\s+LOCAL

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\,v2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+orphan\s+skb\s+on\s+LOCAL_IN\s+path\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] ipvs: orphan skb on LOCAL_IN path (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:18:05 +0200 (EET); Hello, If early demux finds one socket in PRE_ROUTING and later we DNAT the packet to different local real server we should drop the socket. That is why in previous email I thought ip_vs_nat_send_or_; /html/lvs-devel/2015-01/msg00032.html (10,587 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] ipvs: orphan skb on LOCAL_IN path (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:24:27 -0800; Hey Simon when you say "blow" what exactly happens? Does the kernel panic? Assuming this is a bug fix could you provide some information on when the problem was introduced? The reason is to facilitat; /html/lvs-devel/2015-01/msg00031.html (10,931 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH net-next,v2] ipvs: orphan skb on LOCAL_IN path (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:02:19 +0900; Hi Alex, when you say "blow" what exactly happens? Does the kernel panic? Assuming this is a bug fix could you provide some information on when the problem was introduced? The reason is to facilitate; /html/lvs-devel/2015-01/msg00027.html (12,589 bytes)
4. [PATCH net-next,v2] ipvs: orphan skb on LOCAL_IN path (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:25:51 -0800; may be a time-wait socket, which will blow up in the ip6_output path when we try to pull out the non-existant pinet6 pointer (the type-punning causes that pointer to be garbage). This patch orphans; /html/lvs-devel/2015-01/msg00025.html (10,632 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]