Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\]\s+ipvs\:\s+remove\s+unnecessary\s+assignment\s+in\s+__ip_vs_get_out

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\]\s+ipvs\:\s+remove\s+unnecessary\s+assignment\s+in\s+__ip_vs_get_out_rt\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: remove unnecessary assignment in __ip_vs_get_out_rt (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:29:17 +0200; Thanks, I have applied this to ipvs-next and will see about getting it included in v3.18. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo; /html/lvs-devel/2014-10/msg00016.html (10,932 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net-next] ipvs: remove unnecessary assignment in __ip_vs_get_out_rt (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 01:22:00 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Looks like this line appeared unexpectedly in commit "ipvs: Eliminate rt->rt_dst usage in __ip_vs_get_out_rt()." Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; /html/lvs-devel/2014-10/msg00014.html (10,221 bytes)
3. [PATCH net-next] ipvs: remove unnecessary assignment in __ip_vs_get_out_rt (score: 1): Author: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:30:08 -0700; It is a precondition of the function that daddr be equal to dest->addr.ip if dest is non-NULL, so this additional assignment is just confusing for stupid engineers like me. Signed-off-by: Alex Gartre; /html/lvs-devel/2014-10/msg00013.html (9,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]