Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\]\s+net\:\s+Enable\s+some\s+sysctls\s+for\s+the\s+userns\s+root\s+with\s+privilege\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Enable some sysctls for the userns root with privilege (score: 1)
Author: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 14:16:43 -0800
Enabled sysctls include the followings: 1. net/ipv4/neigh/<if>/* 2. net/ipv6/neigh/<if>/* 3. net/ieee802154/6lowpan/* 4. net/ipv6/route/* 5. net/ipv4/vs/* 6. net/unix/* 7. net/core/xfrm_* In practica
/html/lvs-devel/2021-12/msg00006.html (13,930 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Enable some sysctls for the userns root with privilege (score: 1)
Author: CGEL <cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:18:28 +0000
Hi, Jakub My patch is a little radical. I just saw Eric's previous reply to Alexander(https://lore.kernel.org/all/87pmsqyuqy.fsf@disp2133/). These were disabled because out of an abundance of caution
/html/lvs-devel/2021-12/msg00005.html (12,868 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Enable some sysctls for the userns root with privilege (score: 1)
Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:45:20 -0800
You need to justify why removing these checks is safe. It sounds like you're only describing why having the permissions is problematic, which is fair but not sufficient to just remove them. These tag
/html/lvs-devel/2021-12/msg00004.html (18,595 bytes)

4. [PATCH net-next] net: Enable some sysctls for the userns root with privilege (score: 1)
Author: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:28:15 +0000
Enabled sysctls include the followings: 1. net/ipv4/neigh/<if>/* 2. net/ipv6/neigh/<if>/* 3. net/ieee802154/6lowpan/* 4. net/ipv6/route/* 5. net/ipv4/vs/* 6. net/unix/* 7. net/core/xfrm_* In practica
/html/lvs-devel/2021-12/msg00000.html (15,383 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu