Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\-next\s+03\/12\]\s+ipvs\:\s+prefer\s+NETDEV_DOWN\s+event\s+to\s+free\s+cached\s+dsts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] ipvs: prefer NETDEV_DOWN event to free cached dsts (score: 1)
Author: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:43:10 +0100
I've gone through the unregister code a couple of times now and in theory it should work. The test suit have also been running without problem Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> R
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00021.html (16,139 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] ipvs: prefer NETDEV_DOWN event to free cached dsts (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:21:17 +0200 (EET)
Hello, This should not be a problem. Even without ns exit situation, we can have a case where device goes down, the output routes will start to fail and we will not cache route anymore. It can happen
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00017.html (14,416 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] ipvs: prefer NETDEV_DOWN event to free cached dsts (score: 1)
Author: Hans Schillstrom <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:56:29 +0100
Hi Julian Have you test this in a network namespace ? i.e. kill the namespace with heave traffic through it From what I remember this was a tricky area... I have some test cases for this, should I ru
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00014.html (13,177 bytes)

4. [PATCH net-next 03/12] ipvs: prefer NETDEV_DOWN event to free cached dsts (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:42:13 +0200
The real server becomes unreachable on down event, no need to wait device unregistration. Should help in releasing dsts early before dst->dev is replaced with lo. Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@
/html/lvs-devel/2013-03/msg00006.html (12,169 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu