Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\s+2\/3\]\s+ipv6\:\s+fill\s+rt6i

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+net\s+2\/3\]\s+ipv6\:\s+fill\s+rt6i_gateway\s+with\s+nexthop\s+address\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address (score: 1): Author: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:42:05 -0400 (EDT); I have no strong opinion about removing rt6_nexthop. If it is of low cost today and makes the code easier to undersand and grep, just leave it alone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00054.html (11,405 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:31:06 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Thanks for the review! I don't mind too about removing rt6_nexthop. For me it is 51% against 49% to keep it as it denotes the places that use nexthop and not gateway. May be more opinions will; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00050.html (11,281 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address (score: 1): Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:01:59 +0200; The patch is fine. I don't mind if we leave it as is or remove rt6_nexthop, so: Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the l; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00048.html (10,844 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address (score: 1): Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:33:04 +0200; Hm, looks good. Will test is soon. One small remark: Maybe we can kill rt6_nexthop completly and use rt6i_gateway directly so a reader does not have to lookup this function. Thanks, Hannes -- To unsu; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00046.html (11,206 bytes)
5. [PATCH net 2/3] ipv6: fill rt6i_gateway with nexthop address (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:43:04 +0300; Make sure rt6i_gateway contains nexthop information in all routes returned from lookup or when routes are directly attached to skb for generated ICMP packets. The effect of this patch should be a fas; /html/lvs-devel/2013-10/msg00045.html (13,025 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]