Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+nf\s+0\/5\]\s+IPVS\s+fixes\s+for\s+v3\.11\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+nf\s+0\/5\]\s+IPVS\s+fixes\s+for\s+v3\.11\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH nf 0/5] IPVS fixes for v3.11 (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:40:50 +0900; Julian pointed out that there is an error in one the changelogs. Accordingly, I'Ll fix that and send a fresh pull-request once 3.11 is released. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub; /html/lvs-devel/2013-08/msg00108.html (10,989 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH nf 0/5] IPVS fixes for v3.11 (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:24:25 +0900; Sure, that is completely fine by me. Let me know if you would like me to rebase and/or send a fresh pull-request at that time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel"; /html/lvs-devel/2013-08/msg00107.html (10,467 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH nf 0/5] IPVS fixes for v3.11 (score: 1): Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:26:53 +0200; Hi Simon, We're fairly late in the -rc cycle. I prefer to ask David to take these once 3.11 is released, then ask for -stable inclusion. Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu; /html/lvs-devel/2013-08/msg00106.html (10,031 bytes)
4. [PATCH nf 0/5] IPVS fixes for v3.11 (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:14:23 +0900; Hi Pablo, I'm not sure if it is too late in the cycle but if not could you please consider these fixes for v3.11? In my opinion these all seem to be -stable candidates. I would appreciate your opinio; /html/lvs-devel/2013-08/msg00097.html (12,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]