Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+nf\s+v2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+fix\s+AF\s+assignment\s+in\s+ip_vs_conn

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+nf\s+v2\]\s+ipvs\:\s+fix\s+AF\s+assignment\s+in\s+ip_vs_conn_new\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH nf v2] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:08:00 +0900; Thanks, I'll queue this up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org; /html/lvs-devel/2014-02/msg00000.html (11,401 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH nf v2] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:29:22 +0200 (EET); Hello, Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Looks like problem comes from commit be8be9eccbf2d908a7e56b3f7a71105cd88da06b "ipvs: Fix IPv4 FWMARK virtual services" (2.6.30). Regards -- Julian Anasta; /html/lvs-devel/2014-01/msg00008.html (11,836 bytes)
3. [PATCH nf v2] ipvs: fix AF assignment in ip_vs_conn_new() (score: 1): Author: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:50:20 +0100 (CET); If a fwmark is passed to ip_vs_conn_new(), it is passed in vaddr, not daddr. Therefore we should set AF to AF_UNSPEC in vaddr assignment (like we do in ip_vs_ct_in_get()), otherwise we may copy only; /html/lvs-devel/2014-01/msg00007.html (10,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]