Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v2\s+1\/2\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+Verify\s+that\s+IP_VS\s+protocol\s+has\s+been\s+registered\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:32:01 +0200
Understood. I'll resend. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00051.html (11,610 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:23:32 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Better to remove the defines. It is a misconfiguration to enable IPVS without protocols. The referenced commit just tried to remove warnings, not save memory by commenting unused function. Add
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00050.html (11,447 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:06:22 +0200
Oh, so it wasn't getting built right now at all if we didn't select any protocols. How about moving those defines down to our loop as well? this way everything will behave exactly like it did before.
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00049.html (11,257 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:53:08 +0300 (EEST)
Hello, Ops. It seems now we expose old problem when no protocol is configured. As this change probably will go to stable kernels, lets make it correct. Can you remove the defines around register_ip_v
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00048.html (15,685 bytes)

5. [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered (score: 1)
Author: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:22:01 -0400
The registration of a protocol might fail, there were no checks and all registrations were assumed to be correct. This lead to NULL ptr dereferences when apps tried registering. For example: [ 1293.2
/html/lvs-devel/2012-04/msg00046.html (14,533 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu