Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+Routing\s+loop\s+handling\s+in\s+IP\s+VS\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\]\s+Routing\s+loop\s+handling\s+in\s+IP\s+VS\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFC] Routing loop handling in IP VS... (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:43:16 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Thanks! It is not something urgent, so no problem. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to m; /html/lvs-devel/2016-07/msg00013.html (9,067 bytes)
2. Re: [RFC] Routing loop handling in IP VS... (score: 1): Author: "Dwip N. Banerjee" <dwip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:39:47 -0500; Thank you for prompt and detailed response... much appreciated! Yes, I can provide a more comprehensive patch - it may take a little time, but I will send it out as soon as I can. Thanks Dwip Banerje; /html/lvs-devel/2016-07/msg00012.html (16,287 bytes)
3. Re: [RFC] Routing loop handling in IP VS... (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:21:41 +0300 (EEST); Hello, In some cases backup_only=1 can help, not if modes do not change in time and both servers are set as masters. OK, lets add TTL decrease. We write the IP header anyways, so I guess the CPU writ; /html/lvs-devel/2016-07/msg00011.html (14,841 bytes)
4. [RFC] Routing loop handling in IP VS... (score: 1): Author: "Dwip N. Banerjee" <dwip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:23:40 -0500; Problem: A problem has been identified in a cluster environment using IPVS with Direct Routing where multiple appliances can end up in the "active forwarder/distributor" state simultaneously. As an "; /html/lvs-devel/2016-07/msg00010.html (12,125 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]