Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\s+PATCH\s+nf\-next\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+Divide\s+estimators\s+into\s+groups\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\s+PATCH\s+nf\-next\]\s+netfilter\:\s+ipvs\:\s+Divide\s+estimators\s+into\s+groups\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFC PATCH nf-next] netfilter: ipvs: Divide estimators into groups (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:32:35 +0300 (EEST); Hello, I started reworking the estimation code. I think, I'll have results in few days. I'm using kthreads, the locking is ready, just finishing the cpumask/nice configuration and will do simple test; /html/lvs-devel/2022-08/msg00014.html (10,741 bytes)
2. Re: [RFC PATCH nf-next] netfilter: ipvs: Divide estimators into groups (score: 1): Author: Jiri Wiesner <jwiesner@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:22:57 +0200; The RFC patch already resolves the issue despite having the code still run in softirq context. Even if estimators were processed in groups, moving the rate estimation out of softirq context is a good; /html/lvs-devel/2022-08/msg00006.html (9,708 bytes)
3. Re: [RFC PATCH nf-next] netfilter: ipvs: Divide estimators into groups (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 15:11:48 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Other developers tried solutions with workqueues but so far we don't see any results. Give me some days, may be I can come up with solution that uses kthread(s) to allow later nice/cpumask cfg; /html/lvs-devel/2022-08/msg00004.html (12,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]