Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+\[Keepalived\]\s+Real\s+IP\s+and\s+virtual\s+IP\s+not\s+in\s+the\s+same\s+subnet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+\[Keepalived\]\s+Real\s+IP\s+and\s+virtual\s+IP\s+not\s+in\s+the\s+same\s+subnet\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Patrick Schaaf <netdev@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:25:29 +0200; Probably won't help, but - you DO have the SAME virtual_router_id on both machines? I got bitten by my brain telling me to use DIFFERENT ones when I first started playing with keepalived a year ago,; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00015.html (10,420 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Tom van Leeuwen <tom.van.leeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:25:19 +0200; Hi Stephane, When starting 1 LVS keepalived process, you have 1 server broadcasting VRRP packets. Those packets must be received by the second LVS server (regardless of whether keepalived is running); /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00012.html (16,395 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Stephane RIOS <s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:58:33 +0200; Hi Tom Thank you for your reply ! Le 08/07/11 07:14, Tom van Leeuwen a écrit : Yep. Packets are sent but not received, this is the point. No. Should I do this ? Everything fine : lvs1:~# ping -I eth0; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00011.html (13,996 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Tom van Leeuwen <tom.van.leeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:14:35 +0200; Hi Stephane, Probably stupid, but: have you also checked that VRRP packets are recieved correctly? If you start 1 keepalived, does the other see the vrrp? Also: have you specified different (global d; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00010.html (11,791 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:09:00 -0700 (PDT); No. an LVS is intended to run with the RIPs on any network at all (but usually are private addresses, so you don't use a public IP and so that people on the outside can't get to the RIPs) and the VIP; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00009.html (9,461 bytes)
6. [lvs-users] [Keepalived] Real IP and virtual IP not in the same subnet (score: 1): Author: Stephane RIOS <s@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:22:55 +0200; Hi all This is slightly off-topic because it concerns especially keepalived and not lvs but i read a lot of posts in this list about keepalived so ... I've made a very simple setup of 2 LVS nodes (De; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00008.html (10,180 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]