- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Antefacto patches missing (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:15:07 +0300 (EEST)
- Hello, It seems I'll have a new address: http://ja.ssi.bg/ http://ja.ssi.bg/nfct/ you can use it for future reference. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> ________________________________________
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00019.html (10,242 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Antefacto patches missing (score: 1)
- Author: Brent Jensen <brent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:45:46 -0700
- Thanks! Good to know that someone has a backup somewhere ;) I've been using the Antefacto patches for years, however, I just now discovered that they are no longer around: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00011.html (10,033 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] Antefacto patches missing (score: 1)
- Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:25:42 +0300 (EEST)
- Hello, It looks like a problem in my ISP, I have to contact them... I simply didn't noticed it before your posting. Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> ___________________________________________
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00010.html (10,207 bytes)
- 4. [lvs-users] Antefacto patches missing (score: 1)
- Author: Brent Jensen <brent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:38:36 -0700
- I run LVS-NAT clusters with firewalling. I've been using the Antefacto patches for years, however, I just now discovered that they are no longer around: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/ I'm using Centos 5
- /html/lvs-users/2013-04/msg00008.html (8,699 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu