Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Clientless\s+configuration\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Clientless\s+configuration\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Clientless configuration? (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:24:31 +0000; Alex, Their is also PEN for that, but I have no personal experience: http://blog.loadbalancer.org/load-balancing-udp-on-ec2/ -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00044.html (13,092 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Clientless configuration? (score: 1): Author: Alex Kaplan <akaplan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:29:36 -0700; Well, the trouble is that HAProxy doesn't support UDP. I'll look into SNAT mode. Thanks! -- Alex Kaplan Systems Engineer Tagged, Inc. akaplan@xxxxxxxxxx ______________________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00042.html (11,644 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Clientless configuration? (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:15:35 +0000; Alex, You could use the SNAT mode i.e. proxy: http://blog.loadbalancer.org/enabling-snat-in-lvs-xt_ipvs-and-iptables/ However if you are going to do that it would make far more sense to use HAProxy h; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00041.html (10,583 bytes)
4. [lvs-users] Clientless configuration? (score: 1): Author: Alex Kaplan <akaplan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:12:35 -0700; I've been searching for answers, but haven't come up with any so far. Is there a way to configure LVS such that load balancing is done without any loopback or route configuration on the real servers?; /html/lvs-users/2014-03/msg00040.html (8,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]