Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Direct\s+routing\s+not\s+working\s+on\s+CentOS\s+6\.5\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Direct\s+routing\s+not\s+working\s+on\s+CentOS\s+6\.5\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Direct routing not working on CentOS 6.5 (score: 1): Author: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:21:16 +0200; [SNIP] [SNIP] What do you do to prevent ARP responses from proxy01 for the IP 10.0.200.60? The usual way this is done by configuring this IP on interface lo:0 and then putting something like this in; /html/lvs-users/2014-05/msg00007.html (10,406 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Direct routing not working on CentOS 6.5 (score: 1): Author: Alex Attarian <u2sashko@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:39:27 -0700; Was that your full tcpdump output? Is your traffic coming in through eth2 on proxy1 and also going out through eth2 or different interface? _______________________________________________ Please read; /html/lvs-users/2014-05/msg00006.html (16,604 bytes)
3. [lvs-users] Direct routing not working on CentOS 6.5 (score: 1): Author: "Sal Munguia" <lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:20:25 -0400; Setup Load Balancer's using Keepalived load01 and load02 == Load01 config: [root@vml-load01 ~]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00; /html/lvs-users/2014-05/msg00005.html (13,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]