- 1. Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering (score: 1)
- Author: David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
- that's unfortunante. there isn't a way to do CLUSTERIP on the prerouteing chain? but it depends on if the firewall is a packet filter firewall or a proxy firewall. If it's a proxy firewall CLUSTERIP
- /html/lvs-users/2011-05/msg00016.html (11,456 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering (score: 1)
- Author: CeR <cer.inet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:54:56 +0200
- Thanks, I will take a look? No. CLUSTERIP only works on the INPUT chain, not on the forward chain. What do you mean? Could you be more specific? OK to not user CLUSTERIP. But what about an active/ac
- /html/lvs-users/2011-05/msg00013.html (10,104 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Schwartzkopff <misch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:20:30 +0200
- No. CLUSTERIP only works on the INPUT chain, not on the forward chain. Believe me that you do not want to setup an active/active firewall, but an active/passive cluster. -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
- /html/lvs-users/2011-05/msg00010.html (10,314 bytes)
- 4. Re: [lvs-users] Firewall clustering (score: 1)
- Author: David Lang <david.lang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
- take a look at CLUSTERIP with heartbeat/pacemaker, it may be what you really want the usual way that LVS is used with pacemaker is that you have a HA pair of LVS laod balancer boxes that load balance
- /html/lvs-users/2011-05/msg00009.html (10,614 bytes)
- 5. [lvs-users] Firewall clustering (score: 1)
- Author: CeR <cer.inet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:28:51 +0200
- Hi there! I'm looking for some info about building firewall cluster active/active with load balancing. I previous worked with corosync+pacemaker+conntrack to get an active/passive cluster (without lo
- /html/lvs-users/2011-05/msg00008.html (10,000 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu