- 1. Re: [lvs-users] LVS : simple load balancing failover (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Scott <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:11:19 +0000
- Hi, If you want to move an IP from one server to a backup server (should the primary server fail) then just use the VRRP part of Keepalived and ignore/remove the LVS bits. If the primary keepalived d
- /html/lvs-users/2015-11/msg00008.html (11,713 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] LVS : simple load balancing failover (score: 1)
- Author: Alexandre <infos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 21:07:41 +0100
- Thank you Michael for your information, I will test pacemaker. Can I use keepalived for single IP Failover Cluster ? Regards, Alexandre. _______________________________________________ Please read th
- /html/lvs-users/2015-11/msg00007.html (10,117 bytes)
- 3. Re: [lvs-users] LVS : simple load balancing failover (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Schwartzkopff <ms@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 17:48:59 +0100
- Am Sonntag, 8. November 2015, 17:34:40 schrieb Alexandre: HA Cluster. See clusterlabs.org. Application: corosync and pacemaker. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sy
- /html/lvs-users/2015-11/msg00006.html (9,545 bytes)
- 4. [lvs-users] LVS : simple load balancing failover (score: 1)
- Author: Alexandre <infos@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 17:34:40 +0100
- Hello everyone, I use LVS with ldirectord, I would load balancing between 2 machines but with a master machine. I just want to send the traffic on the host if the master host is down. Would you have
- /html/lvs-users/2015-11/msg00005.html (8,294 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu