Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Outgoing\s+TCP\s+from\s+real\s+servers\s+using\s+VIP\s+as\s+the\s+source\s+in\s+DR\s+balancing\s+mode\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+Outgoing\s+TCP\s+from\s+real\s+servers\s+using\s+VIP\s+as\s+the\s+source\s+in\s+DR\s+balancing\s+mode\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:32:26 +0400; Hello, [] [] Thank you very much. Indeed scheduling does work with SYN+ACK. The problem was an incorrect iptables rule. Now it's fixerd an everything works as expected. Thank you! -- Best regards, Dm; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00018.html (12,600 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:06:50 +0200 (EET); Hello, I think, you described the setup in previous email. IPVS supports creating new TCP connection for SYN+ACK packet. While Netfilter's stateful inspection differentiates SYN from SYN+ACK packets,; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00011.html (16,437 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:21:56 +0400; Hello, Let me describe the situation again. One of the servers in the farm, server X, as a unique port range (16000-16999, for example), assigned to it. That server starts an outgoing TCP connection; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00010.html (17,271 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 00:02:16 +0200 (EET); Hello, For IPVS tcp_conn_schedule schedules TCP packets only when SYN is present, no matter the ACK flag. Can you check with IPVS debugging what exactly happens? May be the problem is netfilter state; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00009.html (13,656 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: "Purcocks, Graham" <gpurcocks@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:46:18 +0000; That brightened up the morning so much. Thank you sir! --Original Message-- From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graeme Fowler; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00008.html (11,183 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:02:05 +0400; Hello, We tried exactly that on a CentOS 6 install. It LOOKS like IPVS alreays builds a 'session' to relay tcp traffic, even if there is only 1 "real" server in the "virtual server set". And it LOOKS; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00007.html (15,741 bytes)
7. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:52:14 +0000; Oh goodness me, TEA. I haven't had any tea this morning. By now this is completely obvious. Apologies for the unintentional laughter I have now created! Graeme _______________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00006.html (9,738 bytes)
8. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:46:21 +0000; Obviously you wouldn't do that in the INPUT chain. I haven't had any teat this morning :) Graeme _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's av; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00005.html (10,348 bytes)
9. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:38:57 +0000; Hi Dmitry Nice to see you pop up here (I was the CGP person at Loughborough Uni). As Julian suggested, probably the easiest way to do this is to use fwmarks. On the director, have an iptables rule (o; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00004.html (11,454 bytes)
10. Re: [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:23:18 +0200 (EET); Hello, What about using 10 match rules in mangle/PREROUTING to mark every port range. Add 10 fwmark-based virtual servers containing single real server again in DR mode. There is a problem if this do; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00003.html (13,246 bytes)
11. [lvs-users] Outgoing TCP from real servers using VIP as the source in DR balancing mode (score: 1): Author: Dmitry Akindinov <dimak@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:15:49 +0400; Hello, We have met the following problem with "reverse balancing". There is a set of servers (let's say 10), and a load-balancer (for which we would like to use Linux with the ipvs module). The balan; /html/lvs-users/2012-01/msg00002.html (11,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]